February 18, 2012

Anonymous asked: soo I sent you a valentine's day e-card but it says you still didn't view it.. type in tumblrlinks[dót]cóm/?internetnewsroom69 then sign up as ''internetnewsroom69'' and view premium inbox

lolsummer69´s cousin,how you doing

January 23, 2012
953 dead people voted in the South Carolina GOP primary

illituracy:

abdicassetis:

i’m going to give them the benefit of the doubt and just believe that south carolina’s actually got, like mad zombies right now, and they’re not going to have time to address this issue because they’re all too busy stocking up on ammunition and busting heads

god bless

voting zombies. this is a problem. I live too close to SC for this to be true.

(Source: anticapitalist, via illiturate)

January 22, 2012
biowens:

youranonnews:

ACTA in a Nutshell –
What is ACTA?  ACTA is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. A new intellectual property enforcement treaty being negotiated by the United States, the European Community, Switzerland, and Japan, with Australia, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Mexico, Jordan, Morocco, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Canada recently announcing that they will join in as well.
Why should you care about ACTA? Initial reports indicate that the treaty will have a very broad scope and will involve new tools targeting “Internet distribution and information technology.”
What is the goal of ACTA? Reportedly the goal is to create new legal standards of intellectual property enforcement, as well as increased international cooperation, an example of which would be an increase in information sharing between signatory countries’ law enforcement agencies.
Essential ACTA Resources - 
Read more about ACTA here: ACTA Fact Sheet
Read the authentic version of the ACTA text as of 15 April 2011, as finalized by participating countries here: ACTA Finalized Text
Follow the history of the treaty’s formation here: ACTA history
Read letters from U.S. Senator Ron Wyden wherein he challenges the constitutionality of ACTA: Letter 1 | Letter 2 | Read the Administration’s Response to Wyden’s First Letter here: Response
Watch a short informative video on ACTA: ACTA Video
Watch a lulzy video on ACTA: Lulzy Video
Say NO to ACTA. It is essential to spread awareness and get the word out on ACTA.

Reblog because serious…Also because clearly i am so cheered up by 9gagXoxo

biowens:

youranonnews:

ACTA in a Nutshell –

What is ACTA?  ACTA is the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. A new intellectual property enforcement treaty being negotiated by the United States, the European Community, Switzerland, and Japan, with Australia, the Republic of Korea, New Zealand, Mexico, Jordan, Morocco, Singapore, the United Arab Emirates, and Canada recently announcing that they will join in as well.

Why should you care about ACTA? Initial reports indicate that the treaty will have a very broad scope and will involve new tools targeting “Internet distribution and information technology.”

What is the goal of ACTA? Reportedly the goal is to create new legal standards of intellectual property enforcement, as well as increased international cooperation, an example of which would be an increase in information sharing between signatory countries’ law enforcement agencies.

Essential ACTA Resources

  • Read more about ACTA here: ACTA Fact Sheet
  • Read the authentic version of the ACTA text as of 15 April 2011, as finalized by participating countries here: ACTA Finalized Text
  • Follow the history of the treaty’s formation here: ACTA history
  • Read letters from U.S. Senator Ron Wyden wherein he challenges the constitutionality of ACTA: Letter 1 | Letter 2 | Read the Administration’s Response to Wyden’s First Letter here: Response
  • Watch a short informative video on ACTA: ACTA Video
  • Watch a lulzy video on ACTA: Lulzy Video

Say NO to ACTA. It is essential to spread awareness and get the word out on ACTA.

Reblog because serious…
Also because clearly i am so cheered up by 9gag
Xoxo

(via illiturate)

January 21, 2012
Standing On the Fringes of Life: Alright people, we need to concern ourselves with ACTA

sickwithjustice:

chocotaur:

Five facts:

1. ACTA isn’t the “European” SOPA. It’s nearly GLOBAL, and will apply to every country that signs the treaty.

2. ACTA is far more aggressive. ACTA will not simply affect websites and have them blocked out of the internet - its measures go as…

January 21, 2012

daniflores:

ACTA Explained - Spread the Word (by btb617)

(via owlswearglasses)

January 21, 2012
spatzmoras:

This is a threat to all of us. We helped stop SOPA and PIPA, let’s do it again with ACTA. Petition here http://www.stopp-acta.info/english/get+involved/petition/petition.html
Find out more info here http://www.laquadrature.net/
http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php?option=com_tags&task=view&tag=acta&Itemid=408
Watch these videos to find out more info http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=citzRjwk-sQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlFyoEKV0dE
To find out what you can do go here http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/How_to_act_against_ACTA

spatzmoras:

This is a threat to all of us. We helped stop SOPA and PIPA, let’s do it again with ACTA. Petition here http://www.stopp-acta.info/english/get+involved/petition/petition.html

Find out more info here http://www.laquadrature.net/

http://www.michaelgeist.ca/index.php?option=com_tags&task=view&tag=acta&Itemid=408

Watch these videos to find out more info http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=citzRjwk-sQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlFyoEKV0dE

To find out what you can do go here http://www.laquadrature.net/wiki/How_to_act_against_ACTA

January 21, 2012

joshnowin3d:

Round 2: Think SOPA was bad? ACTA is much, much worse.

January 20, 2012
No más SOPA: Nota de prensa de US House of Representatives sobre la votación de PIPA

nomassopa:

Statement from Chairman Smith on Senate Delay of Vote on PROTECT IP Act

For Immediate Release
January 20, 2012
Contact: Kim Smith Hicks, 202-225-3951

Statement from Chairman Smith on Senate Delay of Vote on PROTECT IP Act

Washington, D.C. — House Judiciary CommitteeChairman Lamar…

(Source: judiciary.house.gov)

January 20, 2012
Russia warns that Iran strike could trigger 'chain reaction'

verbalresistance:

Russia strongly criticised Western belligerence towards Syria and Iran yesterday, saying that a military assault on the Iranian regime could cause a “chain reaction” that would destabilise the entire world.

The country’s Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov, also said during his annual televised press conference that Russia would use its veto at the UN Security Council to block any resolution calling for military force to be used against Syria.

Mr Lavrov said that Russia is “seriously worried” that military action against Iran may be under consideration, and vowed that Moscow would do all it could to prevent it. “The consequences will be extremely grave,” he said. “It’s not going to be an easy walk. It will trigger a chain reaction and I don’t know where it will stop.”

Last week, a Russian newspaper revealed that the annual training exercises undertaken in southern Russia by the country’s army will focus this year on scenarios related to the regional fallout of a possible military conflict in Iran.

Russia has supported some sanctions against Iran, but has rejected any talk of new sanctions. The US has already applied new economic sanctions and the EU is considering whether to follow suit as concerns mount over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions, but Mr Lavrov said that such moves were disingenuous and had “nothing to do with a desire to strengthen nuclear non-proliferation”. Instead, Mr Lavrov added, the new sanctions were aimed at “stifling the Iranian economy and the population in an apparent hope to provoke discontent”.

On Syria, where the uprising against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime is in its 10th month, the Russian Foreign Minister was equally forthright, ruling out any support from Moscow at the UN for military intervention.

Russia abstained from a Security Council vote on military intervention in Libya and was subsequently furious at what it felt was a bombing campaign that went far beyond the remit to “protect civilians” authorised by the UN.

Moscow has since made it clear on several occasions that it will not tolerate a repeat in Syria, a message that Mr Lavrov reiterated yesterday. “If some intend to use force at all cost we can hardly prevent that from happening,” he said.

“But let them do it at their own initiative, on their own conscience; they won’t get any authorisation from the UN Security Council.”

He was also unapologetic over claims that Russia has been delivering arms to the Syrian regime despite an EU arms embargo on the country. A ship believed to be carrying weapons from Russia was briefly detained in Cyprus earlier this month, before continuing to its final destination in Syria.

Russia has not confirmed that it has been delivering arms to the country, but Mr Lavrov effectively told the West to mind its own business yesterday. “We haven’t violated any international agreements or the UN Security Council resolutions,” he said.

He also accused Western countries of supplying munitions to the Syrian opposition, which he labelled as “unacceptable and absolutely counterproductive”.

The Independent

(via raindancenaked)

January 20, 2012
Sopa´s down but not dead,Sopa backers are mainly democrats

¨Money doesn´t talk,it swears¨